Concussion in sport: They thought it was all over… is it now?

On 27 April, the Digital Media Culture and Sport Select Committee (DMCSSC) reconvened for a third oral hearing to address concussion in sport, the recording of which can be accessed here.  Originally planned to be a two hearing process, this latest session appears to have been convened at the request of the witnesses. Their evidence was taken in two panel sessions, the first involving player representatives:

  • Damian Hopley MBE, Chief Executive at The Rugby Players Association
  • Paul Struthers, Director at Professional Players Federation
  • Gordon Taylor OBE, Chief Executive at Professional Footballers Association

and the second involving specialist clinicians:

  • Dr John Etherington CBE, Medical Director & Consultant Rheumatologist at Faculty of Sport and Exercise Medicine UK
  • Dr Richard Sylvester, Consultant Neurologist at Institute of Sport, Exercise and Health
Continue reading

Out of COVID-19 lockdown and into new territory? QOCS is still coming to Scotland…

By Scottish Ministerial order, Qualified One-way Costs Shifting (QOCS) is to apply to Scottish personal injury claims – including disease claims and fatality claims – litigated from 30 June 2021. To recap, QOCS is a departure from the usual ‘loser pays’ approach to legal costs and expenses. The guiding principles of QOCS are (i) promoting access to justice in these types of case by generally protecting losing pursuers (hence ‘one way’) from having to meet successful defenders’ costs and (ii) at the same time enabling the removal of that protection in limited specific circumstances (hence ‘qualified’).

Continue reading

The interim discount rate is just as flawed as the notional 2.5% rate it temporarily replaces

The move last week by the DoJ NI to set an interim discount rate might look like progress, but really it’s stepping back in time 25 years. The 1996 Act which the DoJ has triggered to set its interim rate of -1.75% is totally out of date and was replaced in both England and Scotland two years ago.

It was widely recognised that the rate in NI of 2.5% based on the Act needed changing because it would systematically under-compensate a significant proportion of plaintiffs. But setting an interim rate under the same flawed Act simply swings the pendulum much too far in the opposite direction and will lead to over-compensation in more than 90%* of claims. That level of excess will cost tens of millions of pounds for NI businesses and taxpayers and those additional costs will continue be felt until the new Bill – which the Committee for Justice has chosen to scrutinise until Hallowe’en – comes in. That should bring stability to this area with something of a ‘Goldilocks’ discount rate being set under the new law: not too high, not too low, but just right.

           [* See figure 1 at page 18 of the Government Actuary’s advice to the Lord Chancellor in June 2019.]


Alistair Kinley, Director of Policy & Government Affairs
alistair.kinley@blmlaw.com