The eighth edition of the Ogden Tables was published on Friday 17 July 2020. This latest edition provides a new set of tables, and explanatory notes, to guide and inform the approach to the valuation of lump sum awards for future losses. Unlike in previous additions, there is now a short section of the explanatory notes addressing text dealing with periodical payments.
The main headline change for those dealing with high value claims is a reduction in the level of multipliers as a result of a slowdown in life expectancy improvement compared with the assumptions that were adopted when the seventh edition was produced. A change to those figures was anticipated in BLM’s previous blog in November 2019, a copy of which can be accessed here.
Earlier today we indicated that the calling of the election may impact on the proposed commencement in April of the whiplash reforms in part 1 of the Act. Despite that, two new announcements from the government should be noted.
The first is the clear statement by Justice Minister Chris Philp MP that claims made by minors and protected parties will (a) be subject to new tariff damages (b) remain subject to the £1,000 small claims limit but (c) not be processed via the new online system. These clarifications were set out in this written reply to Labour MP Ellie Reeves (a member of the Justice Select Committee).
The second is the publication by Treasury of post-consultation material in connection with section 11 of the Act, which is the provision by which regulations will be made requiring insurers to account for savings arising from the reforms in both parts of the Act. The latest Treasury document sets out technical refinements to draft regulations due to be made under section 11. Although the government says it intends to “bring these regulations into force in good time” it is difficult to say quite what that means at the moment.
The Treasury report and revised draft regulations are both available here. The main technical changes to the regulations are: a clearer limitation to private motor polices only, an upward revision of the qualifying threshold from 10,000 to 100,000 such policies per year (which will still cover more than 95% of the market), changing the wording to refer to “premium earned” rather than “premium income”, a removal of requirement to provide information on the technical price and, finally, a broader framing of the option for insurers to provide additional information on wider market issues and pressures.
With parliament being dissolved next week in advance of the December general election, the above could be the last government materials that we’ll see in connection with the Act for several weeks.
This proposal from the Ministry of Justice last week looks to rectify the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 following the Court of Appeal’s 2017 decision in Smith v Lancashire. It seems to have been released in a slightly low-key manner by the MoJ, perhaps because at the heart of it is a need to amend English law to reflect overarching European (Convention) principles – not an easy political ‘sell’ at the moment.